Education Policy in Two Different Countries Essay

knowledge Policy in Two Different Countries launch These refers to the principles and policies made by the ordinatement in the field of instruction, collection of rules and laws that govern the procedures carried out in the gentilityal activity establishment. Education is a solve of study where know leadge, habits and skills of a particular group of people atomic number 18 contractable from generation to generation through training, t from each oneing or carrying out a look into. It occurs in variant forms such(prenominal) as formal, informal and non-formal with diametric purposes from institutions of encyclopaedism like colleges/universities, professional precept and graduate, job training and adult gentility. When implementing program line in a given country, fosterage policies argon evidently cognise that they can affect increase that people engage in like a shot at all ages. They take a crap to be detailedly analyzed for strong learning down the stair s different argonas in the field of cultivates such as the size of initiate to be constructed, grooming choice, certification and teacher precept, aimhouse privatization under commandment policy(Ball, 2009, 89), tracking, teaching methods, graduation requirements, curricular content, investment in the instruct infrastructure, and the value institutions are required to uphold and model. Analysis of nurture policy is a scholarly study that seeks to give answers of different questions such as the purpose of education, personal and societal objectives that education is designed to attain, methods to be used in attaining such objectives and tools applied in measuring their mishap or success. Intended research of informing educational policy is through in a wide variety of learning institutions and several faculty member disciplines. Beneficial researchers are affiliated with different departments such as economics, psychology, tender-hearted development and sociology, depart ments and shallows of education/public policy. Different countries have different educational policies according to the objectives and goals that education is expected to achieve. This essay critically evaluates issues concerning education policy in England and the States.Education policy in England enquiry shows that inequalities in education (Bunar, 2010 p.10) had erupted before schooldayss were started for the children. The data provided by OECD displayed a higher percentage of individuals application tertiary education in many countries if their parents reached tertiary take aim of education. In many countries, educational inequalities continue to increase where people who have acquired education at higher take aims have high possibilities of doing jobs which are non-formal. The question that prevails is whether the actual educational policies are minimizing these gaps. Are they relevant at their level of personneluation? The essay reviews the truth about policies at the school level in England this is due to the number of years one spends in school which is unconditional and plays an important role towards judicature intervention and it is conducted in a instruction that affects potentially all students. Recently, England started a good body of evaluating research of policies at school-level. The paygrade of these policies is based on school resources efficacy, market incentives, ped agogical approaches and school autonomy for raising science of education in schools. Since 1988, education carcass had one key character under The Education Act, which has led to the execution and designing a number of policies in education with an aim of upward(a) standards of education and exertion. A good number of policies have been introduced at each be of education, and a number of these policies have been evaluated. This gives an opportunity for a critical appraisal on such military ranks and the scope of different policies that have influenced opera tion of education. These valuations aim at the different ways of enhancing operation and reduce inequalities in education.educational inequalities in England These inequalities in the achievement of education can be differently identified at near points in individuals lives. However, these educational inequalities out at an early stage in the lifecycle and widen the gap as progress in education sequence is experienced. This description of the inequalities is aimed at motivate the evaluation of policies in education, which are used to alleviate inequalities in education and minimize achievement gaps, which is an important research in the field of education. chthonic this description, individual follows an ordered educational sequence which comprises of years in pre-school, imperious schooling years, post- domineering level of education and lastly to adult.Gaps in pre-school education initially we focused on the educational achievement gaps being present thus far before stude nts started going to school. These gaps are created by the environments they grow in, family back lands and different non-cognitive and cognitive levels of skills children have when entering school. Studies conducted under vocabulary skills (Lervag, 2010 p. 615) shows there is high dispersal of a number of sizeable gaps existing in gender and ethnical groups at the time of entering school.Compulsory school At the stage of imperative schooling, the gaps that were there at the school entry evolve. Where somewhat widens bandage others narrow as abilities of children at school makes them move either up or down the outcomes of the educational distribution. This can be affected by policies of education with the scope of affecting achievement in education.Education at post-compulsory level This level of education is strongly impinged by the disadvantages of education acquired during compulsory schooling and the pre-school years. It determines whether an individual continues with educat ion in post-compulsory level or not. This level is strongly determined by the education level of their parents.Adult learning Inequalities of education continue to increase even when a student completes regular education. They extend to adults in their live of working as their training and education occurs and mostly to those who have acquired higher levels of education. Under those stages of education, it is evident that inequalities in education emerge and exists at all levels in the sequence. Some gaps widen as individuals progresses more through the sequence of education especially those associated with disadvantages of schooling in urban areas are less compared to those in rural areas. This calls for a substantial and a careful evaluation of the policies of education designed to affect educational inequalities. The educational policies raft introduced to the England system of education fifteen years ago provides a good setting for evaluation methods and their success and thus provides a better understanding of educational work.Policy evaluation regarding to England school Although these policies at all levels of lifecycle are important for improving growth in education and discrimination reduction, the policies of school-level ought to be focused on in the England system of education. This is because compulsory years of schooling give an important time for the intervention of the judicature. It likewise acts as a good body of evaluation of the research policies in England. This calls for selective areas of policy with a critical appraisal which is rigorous. The side by side(p) are headings of policy discussion and their methods of evaluation. civilize resources refer to perennial debates concerning educational literary productions of economics of whether if the expenditure of the school is change magnitude pass on have an effect on improving pupil attainment (Peters, 2009 p.1). Research on whether the implantation of such policies can reduce t he types of attainment gaps experienced earlier. The relevance of such implementation is to determine whether additional expenditure can lead to follow sound in developed countries at the typical levels. Inter study research indicated that there is no good relationship amid student outcomes and resources. However, some puts more swithers on studies particularly with methodological design with dictatorial impacts. The quarrel faced in the implementation of this policy is that school resources are everlastingly allocated disproportionately to disadvantaged students. If this issue is not dealt with fully in methodological design, the way resources and attainment are related with one another will be easily obscured. Critical evaluation shows that favorable association between educational disadvantages and school resources is counter-balanced to the unfavorable association between educational attainment and educational disadvantage. This clearly indicates that association between e ducational attainment and school resources is very low, and there is no truthful reflection of casual relationship. at that place is the fact that the implementation of controlled randomized experiments has been impossible, researchers have found it difficult to fold up that such a problem has been solved. Being the biggest category of expenditure of the UK government, it calls for a more significant sense of catch up withting whether if the expenditure is either increased or reduced there is the likelihood of having an impact on students outcomes. This prognosis is very important for the future economy in the country and the future prosperity of individuals. Recent studies have been done concerning this issue in England use national citizen database and all schools expenditure. The national course of study of the English government is shared out into four key levels/stages, then at the end of these stages teachers evaluates the students or they are given national tests th at externally and marked at the school when students are the age of 11 and 16. A study done have critically evaluated the relationship between attainment and expenditure in the secondary school level at the age of 14 and 16 respectively, displayed a lessened positive impact of resources used and on pupil attainment. The challenge nooky it is that political control is used as an instrument for expenditure in the school. Government has initiated better flame work for examining casual effects derived from this context. In early 2000s, a flagship evaluation policy was done on the government labor and the (EiC) program for the secondary schools in England. Under this program, disadvantaged schools principally located in urban areas were provided extra resources with an effort of improving standards. Incentives for a period of more than thirty years a concerted effort has been done with an aim of increasing the choice of parents, competition between schools and their answerableness fo r the children feat (Eom, 2011p.418). If the economy develops wholesome, children go to better schools with incentives of increasing performance. This is because their effort should be strongly linked to pupil study and numbers which is disclosed to parents under the accountability framework. School autonomy most government schools function indoors a given framework based on their jurisdiction concerning scathe of teacher conditions and pay, access codes, constitution of the body that is governing and the curriculum (Clark,2009 p.760). Since 2000, the England government started academies which led to the emergence of new schools given more autonomy compared to typical government schools in terms of their liberty of operations. The rationale piece of ass this crackinger violence on autonomy is to encourage schools to have more innovative policies and drive utilitarianness of standards. In England, the so called academies are managed by any establish governor or their sp onsors who are responsible in recruiting all staffs, freedom over curriculum implementation, agreeing on the terms and conditions of payment and organizational aspects of the school. pedagogics although since the year 2000, school autonomy in England seems to have gained popularity, it has not been true to various school organizational aspects (Terenzin, 2010 p.772). The government has put into place prescriptive measures in order to improve standards in numeracy and literacy through pedagogical methods. The national numeracy and literacy strategy rolled out in 1998 and 1999 was aimed at improving teaching quality through introducing more focused effective management of the figure and book of instructions. Both literacy and numeracy did not present an overall time increase that was allot in teaching some subjects. Both dramatically represented a change on the teaching methods of such subjects. The above evaluation on education policy in England clearly shows that gaps in educati onal attainment are evident from earlier times and have been measured on the lifecycle. Various policies have been reviewed at the school level and implemented in England which brought high standards economic evaluation, aiming to see how scope of educational inequalities can be impinged. This has been done under the evaluation of the following educational policies implemented in England such as incentives, school resources, pedagogical approaches and school autonomy. This issue of reducing educational inequalities and gaps that exist in the sphere of education has been shaped for effective implementation. It enhances positive impacts through the use of the following contextual factors applied in secondary school classroom setting. Structure and organization of the educational system this helps in shaping the development of curriculum by considering the society served by the education system. It reflects the aspirations and the needs of the students, function and the nature of lear ning and realmment conceptualization on the importance of learning. This enables students to know how policies of education are implemented and established, influences the operation of schools and helps them to achieve their educational goals and curricular. Climate of learning in schools this involves many factors and values such as safety practices, cultures, and organizational structures shaping the school to match and function in a given way (Cohen,2009 p.189). Favorable and positive climate created in school by all stakeholders results to higher achievement by students. Teaching staff their professional development plays a great important role by attempting to reform or change an education system. The general purpose behind teachers evaluation is to ensure that the quality of instructions students receive from teachers are safeguarded and improved. Teachers are evaluated through classrooms observation by the principals, coadjutor review of teachers and checking on students performance. Parental involvement for a school to be successful there must have a high cooperation among teachers, school administration and parents. A research done indicated that if parents participate in the education of their children, it results to an increase in the academic achievement of the students and an overall attitude improvement towards school. Classroom environment instructional activities carried out in school are always influenced by environment in the classroom. This includes classroom size, class composition and instructional time. Research indicates that favorable classroom environment benefits academic development thus helping students to achieve educational goals.Education policy in regular army In USA, education is provided by both private and public schools. Education in public schools is universally visible(prenominal), funded and controlled by the state, federal and local government. nonpublic schools are set free to come up with their own curriculum an d policies of staffing. Educational evaluation plays a significant role in USA as it assesses and distinguishes particular characteristics of the education process. It is a professional process by which incessant review is commenced by independent educators with an aim of improving the learning process. This attempt is done to ensure smooth progress on the altogether learning experience. The evaluation process in USA is conducted under the following ternary routes Personal evaluation this comprises of a legal and an ethical process, the standards behind it are educational, significant and judicious. Personnel evaluation standards are easily implemented, clever in funds and proficient in utility. Program evaluation it involves ground standards that provide a guarantee of the demanded information by users. This process of evaluation is based on factors that are prudent, practical, and thrifty and save. It results to an accurate and complete evaluation to the point. Student evaluati on it is a program carried out ethically and legally which is kept in the students mind while others are affected by it. Its standards are diligently judicious, educational and significant therefore it is an extremely useful evaluation to students. The process is very sensible, efficient, affordable, feasible, politically and kindly. Education policy in USA has been effectively evaluated with an aim of ensuring educational effectiveness among students at different levels of education. Policy-amenable of the school characteristics are among the factors controlled under school management or national policy of education. It refers to substantive policy measures of education in areas such as governance, curriculum, accountability and development of a professional teacher and other characteristics at the school-level known to improve teaching. This discussion focuses on three main areas of policy-amenable characteristics of a school which shapes educational policy implementation. They include school climate, school resources and school policies. It is also interested in measuring the school context by mean socio-economic students backgrounds within the school. Relative impacts determined by school characteristics of policy-amenable and school context on the quality of education has helped policy makers to have a control. The question under the educational policy evaluation is why some schools are performing better than others. If the policy evaluation can observe the factors causing such deviation in terms of different school performance, better strategies can be implemented to change such performance deviation that is identifying general characteristics of schools with high performance and use such information to improve performance of a given school. The following are the three main areas according to PISA which shapes education policy implementation and has an effect towards students performance. School resources comprises of tangible resources and materials such as the school size and the quality of physical infrastructure in the school, human resources including number of teaching staff (Peters, 2009 p.1). They have a tertiary qualification and the number of students in the school compared to the available teachers. If the school infrastructure is well constructed and the school has enough teachers the performance of students is plausibly to increase. This evaluation conducted in schools ensures effective implementation of the curriculum which facilitates achievement of educational goals. School climate entails different aspects culture of the school including how well teachers and students get along, disciplinary climate (Crul, 2009 p. 1478). In addition, it includes how committed and motivated schools teachers are and how strongly does the students identify themselves with their school. This factor is implemented well by school principals through ensuring that students are well disciplined and that teachers-students cooperation is improved. It is also well maintained through students motivation that results to high performance of students. School policies it comprises the level of autonomy enjoyed by the school when making decisions, issues concerning accountability of whether self-evaluation is conducted in the school and students progress monitored (Creemers, 2010 p.815). Such policies also determine whether the school gives the parents information concerning the students performance or not. Lastly these policies establish the degree of selectivity in the school concerning admission policies and the way low achievers are conveyancingred to different schools. These factors shape the issue of educational inequality and the gaps created in the secondary level, and if well implemented high attainment is achieved. Conclusively, evaluation of education policy is an important factor in different countries for educational effectiveness. The above evaluation clearly shows some of the challenges experienced in scho ol such educational inequalities, execrable performance and non-effective governance among others results to poor performance. England and USA among other nations have developed educational policy evaluation at different levels of education. From the above discussion, it is clear that these policies have improved standards of education shaped under different contextual factors. Comparably, both countries have had intimately the same factors such as school resources, school policies among other discussed factors above. The good word is that such policies should be improved and well implemented and for who are til now to implement should do it for educational effectiveness.ReferencesAnderson, P., Chisholm, D., & Fuhr, D. C. (2009). Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of policies and programmes to reduce the harm caused by alcohol. The Lancet, 373(9682), 2234-2246.Ball, S. J. (2009). Privatising education, privatising education policy, privatising educational research network gove rnance and the competition state. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 83-99.Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity An overview of issues in the writings and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175-189.Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods. Oxford university press.Bunar, N. (2010). Choosing for quality or inequality current perspectives on the implementation of school choice policy in Sweden. Journal of education policy, 25(1), 1-18.Cohen, J., McCabe, L., Michelli, N. M., & Pickeral, T. (2009). School climate Research, policy, practice, and teacher education. The Teachers College Record, 111(1), 180-213.Cooper, A., Levin, B., & Campbell, C. (2009). The growing (but yet limited) importance of evidence in education policy and practice. Journal of Educational Change, 10(2-3), 159-171.De Bortoli, L., & Thomson, S. (2010). Contextual factors that influence the achievement of Australias Indigenous students Results fr om PISA 2000-2006. OECD Programme for world(prenominal) Student Assessment (PISA), 7.Halsz, G., & Michel, A. (2011). Key Competences in Europe interpretation, policy reflection and implementation. European Journal of Education, 46(3), 289-306.Halpin, D. (Ed.). (2013). Researching education policy Ethical and methodological issues. Routledge.Hobson, A. J., Ashby, P., Malderez, A., & Tomlinson, P. D. (2009). Mentoring line teachers What we know and what we dont. Teaching and teacher education, 25(1), 207-216.Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. refreshen of Educational Research, 79(1), 491-525.Levinson, B. A., Sutton, M., & Winstead, T. (2009). Education Policy as a Practice of index number Theoretical Tools, Ethnographic Methods, Democratic Options. Educational Policy, 23(6), 767-795.Papastergiou, M. (2009). Digital Game-Based Learning in high school Computer Sci ence education Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 1-12.Rappleye, J., Imoto, Y., & Horiguchi, S. (2011). Towards thick descriptionof educational transfer understanding a Japanese institutions importof European language policy. Comparative Education, 47(4), 411-432.Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2009). Globalizing education policy. Routledge.Warnock, M., & Terzi, L. (Eds.). (2010). Special educational needs A new look. Continuum International Publishing Group.Wiseman, A. W. (2010). The uses of evidence for educational policymaking Global contexts and supranational trends. Review of research in education, 34(1), 1-24.Yudof, M. G., Levin, B., Moran, R. F., Ryan, J. E., & Bowman, K. L. (2011). Educational policy and the law. MSU Legal Studies Research Paper, (09-15).Source document